The Impact of Surgical Timing on Outcomes in Patients Undergoing Arteriovenous FistulaCreation for Hemodialysis. A Meta-analysis
Optimizing Outcomes: A Comprehensive Meta-Analysis of AVF Timing for Hemodialysis
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.69750/dmls.01.08.077Keywords:
Arteriovenous fistula, hemodialysis, surgical timing, vascular access, primary failure, postoperative complicationsAbstract
Background: Arteriovenous fistula (AVF) creation is the preferred method for vascular access in hemodialysis patients, offering better long-term patency, fewer complications, and lower infection rates compared to other options. However, the timing of AVF creation plays a critical role in determining outcomes. This meta-analysis examines the impact of surgical timing on AVF success, focusing on primary failure rates, maturation time, patency, and postoperative complications.
Objectives: We sought to evaluate whether the timing of AVF creation impacts outcomes in hemodialysis patients and to provide evidence-based recommendations for clinical practice.
Methods: Following PRISMA guidelines, a comprehensive meta-analysis was conducted from major databases (PubMed, Embase, Cochrane) until 2024 that included data. We selected studies based on defined criteria, and assessed for quality using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale and Cochrane Risk of Bias tool. Primary failure rates, maturation time, primary and secondary patency and postoperative complications were analyzed as outcomes. Heterogeneity was addressed with random effects models, and subgroup analyses were carried out on the basis of patient characteristics.
Results: Early AVF creation (creating an AVF ≥ 6 months prior to dialysis initiation) was shown to reduced primary failure rate by 50%, shortened maturation time by 2 to 3 weeks and increase primary patency rates by up to 35%. Early AVF creation, on the other hand, was also accompanied by fewer postoperative complications, including infection and thrombosis, versus delayed AVF creation. Consistent benefits were seen for different patient profiles in subgroup analyses.
Conclusion: Early AVF creation is associated with superior outcomes, including lower failure rates, quicker maturation, and fewer complications. These findings support early AVF as the preferred practice in hemodialysis care, enhancing long-term patient outcomes and quality of care.
Downloads
References
Hajibandeh S, Burton H, Gleed P, Hajibandeh S, Wilmink T. Impact of arteriovenous fistulas versus arteriovenous grafts on vascular access performance in haemodialysis patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Vasc. 2021;30(6):1021-33. doi:10.1177/17085381211041473
Almasri J, Alsawas M, Mainou M, Mustafa RA, Wang Z, Woo K, et al. Outcomes of vascular access for hemodialysis: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Vasc Surg. 2016;64(1):236-43. doi:10.1016/j.jvs.2016.01.053
Scholz SS, Vukadinović D, Lauder L, Ewen S, Ukena C, Townsend RR, et al. Effects of arteriovenous fistula on blood pressure in patients with end-stage renal disease: A systematic meta-analysis. J Am Heart Assoc. 2019;8(4):e011183. doi:10.1161/JAHA.118.011183
Smith GE, Souroullos P, Cayton T, Harwood A, Carradice D, Chetter IC. Systemic intraoperative anticoagulation during arteriovenous access formation for dialysis: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Vasc Access. 2015;17(1):1-5. doi:10.5301/jva.5000484
Malik MH, Mohammed M, Kallmes DF, Misra S. Endovascular versus surgical arteriovenous fistulas: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Kidney Med. 2022;4(3):100406. doi:10.1016/j.xkme.2021.100406
Yan Wee IJ, Yap HY, Tang TY, Chong TT. Efficacy and safety of endovascular arteriovenous fistula creation: A systematic review, meta-analysis and meta-regression. J Vasc Surg. 2020;71(1):309-17.e5. doi:10.1016/j.jvs.2019.07.057
Kuhan G, Antoniou GA, Nikam M, Mitra S, Farquharson F, Brittenden J, et al. Surgery vs endovascular therapy for thrombosed arteriovenous fistulas and grafts in hemodialysis: A meta-analysis of randomized trials. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2013;36(3):699-705. doi:10.1007/s00270-013-0564-8
Wee JYI, Mohamed IH, Patel A, Choong AMTL. One-stage versus two-stage brachiobasilic arteriovenous fistula creation: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Vasc Surg. 2018;68(1):285-97. doi:10.1016/j.jvs.2018.03.428
Cerneviciute R, Sahebally SM, Ahmed K, Murphy M, Mahmood W, Walsh SR. Regional vs local anaesthesia for haemodialysis AVF formation: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2017;53(5):734-42. doi:10.1016/j.ejvs.2017.01.025
Peralta R, Sousa L, Cristovão AF. Cannulation technique of vascular access in hemodialysis and impact on AVF survival: Systematic review and meta-analysis. J Clin Med. 2023;12(18):5946. doi:10.3390/jcm12185946
Sun JB, Liu CC, Shen X, Chen Q, Xu CL, Cui TL. Percutaneous endovascular AVF: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Front Cardiovasc Med. 2022;9:978285. doi:10.3389/fcvm.2022.978285
Zhang D, Liang J, Yang Y. Features associated with AVF patency: A meta-analysis. Hemodial Int. doi:10.1111/hdi.13183
Ramanarayanan S, Sharma S, Swift O, Laws KR, Umar H, Farrington K. Preoperative interventions to support AVF maturation: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2023;38(10):2330-9. doi:10.1093/ndt/gfad040
Ismail A, Abushouk AI, Bekhet AH, Abunar O, Hassan O, Khamis AA, et al. Regional vs local anesthesia for AVF creation in ESRD: Systematic review and meta-analysis. J Vasc Access. 2017;18(3):177-84. doi:10.5301/jva.5000683
Chan N, Wee I, Soong TK, Syn N, Choong AMTL. Surgical vs endovascular thrombectomy for thrombosed AVG in hemodialysis: Systematic review and meta-analysis. J Vasc Surg. 2019;69(6):1976-88.e7. doi:10.1016/j.jvs.2018.10.102
Rooijens PP, Tordoir JHM, Stijnen T, Burgmans JP, Smet de AAEA, Yo TI. Radiocephalic wrist AVF: Meta-analysis shows high primary failure. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2004;28(6):583-9. doi:10.1016/j.ejvs.2004.08.014
Koudounas G, Giannopoulos S, Volteas P, Aljobeh A, Karkos C, Virvilis D. AVF maturation in ipsilateral vs contralateral tunneled dialysis catheter: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Vasc Surg. 2024;103:14-21. doi:10.1016/j.avsg.2023.11.048
Bashar K, Healy DA, Elsheikh S, Browne LD, Walsh MT, Clarke-Moloney M, et al. One-stage vs two-stage brachiobasilic AVF for dialysis access: Systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One. 2015;10(3):e0120154. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0120154
Tordoir JHM, Zonnebeld N, van Loon MM, Gallieni M, Hollenbeck M. Surgical and endovascular intervention for AVF maturation failure: Evidence review. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2018;55(2):240-8. doi:10.1016/j.ejvs.2017.12.001
Shu P, Wang X, Wen Z, Li C, Luo Y, Xu F. Effect of multiple single cannulation technique on AVF complications: Meta-analysis. Medicine (Baltimore). 2024;103(38):e39748. doi:10.1097/MD.0000000000039748
Tang QH, Yang H, Chen J, Lin QN, Qin Z, Hu M, et al. Transposed AVF vs AVG for hemodialysis: Meta-analysis. J Vasc Access. 2024;25(2):369-89. doi:10.1177/11297298221102875
Bashar K, Medani M, Bashar H, Ahmed K, Aherne T, Moloney T, et al. End-to-side vs side-to-side anastomosis in upper limb AVF: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Vasc Surg. 2018;47:43-53. doi:10.1016/j.avsg.2017.07.036
Wen M, Li Z, Li J, Zhou W, Liu Y, Liu H, et al. Risk factors for primary AVF dysfunction: Multicenter retrospective survival analysis. Blood Purif. 2019;48(3):276-82. doi:10.1159/000500045
Gao C, Weng C, He C, Xu J, Yu L. Regional vs local anesthesia for AVF creation: Systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Anesthesiol. 2020;20(1):219. doi:10.1186/s12871-020-01136-1
Lin SJ, Tung CW, Hsu YC, Shih YH, Wu YL, Chou TC, et al. Prognostic significance of puncture timing for AVF survival: Multicenter cohort. J Clin Med. 2019;8(2):247. doi:10.3390/jcm8020247
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
© The Author(s) 2024. Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License , which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third-party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you must obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.














