Review form for Reviewers

Download Review Form From Here

Developmental Medico-Life-Sciences

139, D-Block, St-4, NFC Society, Lahore, Punjab, Pakistan.

Contact: +923334205687, Email: [email protected]

REVIEWER-PERFORMA

Part A: Editorial office only

Manuscript Number  
Title  
Date sent to reviewer  

Part B: Reviewer only

Section I: Comments per section of manuscript

Title
• Reflects the study conducted.

Abstract
• Structured as per Dev. Med. Life Sci. format, informative and up to 250 words.

Key words
• Added from MeSH
• Short running title given.
• Number of words excluding abstract and references provided.

Conflict of interest
• Disclosed.

Ethical issues
In related to human and animal subjects addressed with approval from Ethical & Research committee of the institute.
 
Introduction
• Subject introduced in sufficient detail with latest references
• Rationale of study provided
• Objective defined in last paragraph
 
Methodology
• Setting and duration described
• Type of study mentioned
• Inclusion & exclusion criteria mentioned
• Randomization / blinding done
• Data collection procedure described
• Statistical analysis method / tests written and significance value mentioned
 
Results
• Reflect the objectives
• Comprehensively described
• Number of tables, charts & figures appropriate / relevant
• Results not duplicated in text
 
Discussion
• Centered to subject with critical review of literature
• Each aspect covered in separate paragraph
 
References
• Written in Vancouver style
• Most are less than five years old
• Pakistani literature included
• Number of references not more than 25
 
Others / Decision  

Section II: Please Evaluate for

Originality
• No work has ever been done previously anywhere
• Similar work reported from other countries
• Similar work not done in Pakistan
• Some studies available in Pakistan
• Well reported in local literature
 
Contribution to the field  
Technical quality  
Clarity of presentation  
Depth of research  

Section III: Recommendation (Kindly mark with an X)

Accept as it is for original article category  
Requires minor corrections  
Requires moderate revision  
Requires major revision  
Reject on ground of (please be specific)  

Reviewer’s information

Name: Designation: