Review form for Reviewers
Download Review Form From Here
Developmental Medico-Life-Sciences
139, D-Block, St-4, NFC Society, Lahore, Punjab, Pakistan.
Contact: +923334205687, Email: [email protected]
REVIEWER-PERFORMA
Part A: Editorial office only
| Manuscript Number | |
| Title | |
| Date sent to reviewer |
Part B: Reviewer only
Section I: Comments per section of manuscript
| Title • Reflects the study conducted. Abstract • Structured as per Dev. Med. Life Sci. format, informative and up to 250 words. Key words • Added from MeSH • Short running title given. • Number of words excluding abstract and references provided. Conflict of interest • Disclosed. Ethical issues In related to human and animal subjects addressed with approval from Ethical & Research committee of the institute. |
|
| Introduction • Subject introduced in sufficient detail with latest references • Rationale of study provided • Objective defined in last paragraph |
|
| Methodology • Setting and duration described • Type of study mentioned • Inclusion & exclusion criteria mentioned • Randomization / blinding done • Data collection procedure described • Statistical analysis method / tests written and significance value mentioned |
|
| Results • Reflect the objectives • Comprehensively described • Number of tables, charts & figures appropriate / relevant • Results not duplicated in text |
|
| Discussion • Centered to subject with critical review of literature • Each aspect covered in separate paragraph |
|
| References • Written in Vancouver style • Most are less than five years old • Pakistani literature included • Number of references not more than 25 |
|
| Others / Decision |
Section II: Please Evaluate for
| Originality • No work has ever been done previously anywhere • Similar work reported from other countries • Similar work not done in Pakistan • Some studies available in Pakistan • Well reported in local literature |
|
| Contribution to the field | |
| Technical quality | |
| Clarity of presentation | |
| Depth of research |
Section III: Recommendation (Kindly mark with an X)
| Accept as it is for original article category | |
| Requires minor corrections | |
| Requires moderate revision | |
| Requires major revision | |
| Reject on ground of (please be specific) |
Reviewer’s information
| Name: | Designation: |














