Evaluating Safety and Efficiency of Laparoscopic General Surgery Techniques in Pakistan. A Retrospective Study
Laparoscopic Surgery Outcomes
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.69750/dmls.01.010.067Keywords:
Laparoscopic surgery, Retrospective study, Logistic regression, Postoperative, AppendectomyAbstract
Background: The minimally invasive nature, reduced complications, and quick recovery of laparoscopic general surgery have changed the face of surgical practice around the world. However, the barriers, adoption of the technology is not widespread in low and middle-income countries (LMICs) such as Pakistan.
Objectives: The objectives of present study were to assess the safety and efficiency of laparoscopic general surgery techniques in Pakistan.
Methods: This retrospective study comprised 200 patients who were scheduled for elective laparoscopic surgeries (50%) cholecystectomy, (30%) appendectomy, and (20%) hernia repairs at tertiary care hospitals in Lahore, Pakistan from June 2023 to September 2024. Intraoperative and postoperative outcomes and predictors of complications were analyzed, and demographic data were analyzed. Logistic regression was used to identify significant predictors of statistical analysis performed using SPSS version 27.
Results: The Patients were 45.6 ± 12.3 years old and had a mean BMI of 28.7 ± 3.4 kg/m². Eighty-five percent of the cases had intraoperative complications; bleeding (4%) was the most common. In 6.5% of cases, conversion to open surgery was noted. In 15%, postoperative complications were found, and wound infection (6%) and seroma formation (5%) were most frequent. Hospital stays were longer in patients with complications (5.5 ± 1.6 days, p<0.001). Logistic regression identified BMI >30 kg/m² (OR: 2. Operative time >90 minutes (OR: 2.6) and 1) as predictors of complications.
Conclusion: Safety & efficiency outcomes of laparoscopic general surgery in Pakistan, comparable to global standards, are demonstrated. To further improve access and outcomes, targeted investments in training, infrastructure, and patient optimization are necessary.
Downloads
References
Bessoff KE, Choi J, Wolff CJ, Kashikar A, Carlos GM, Caddell L, et al. Evidence-based surgery for laparoscopic appendectomy: A stepwise systematic review. Surgery Open Science. 2021;6:29-39.doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sopen.2021.08.001
Biondi A, Di Stefano C, Ferrara F, Bellia A, Vacante M, Piazza L. Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy: a retrospective cohort study assessing outcomes and cost-effectiveness. World Journal of Emergency Surgery. 2016;11(1):44.doi: 10.1186/s13017-016-0102-5
Sermonesi G, Tian BWCA, Vallicelli C, Abu‑Zidan FM, Damaskos D, Kelly MD, et al. Cesena guidelines: WSES consensus statement on laparoscopic-first approach to general surgery emergencies and abdominal trauma. World Journal of Emergency Surgery. 2023;18(1):57.doi: 10.1186/s13017-023-00520-9
Ki YJ, Jo YG, Park YC, Kang WS. The Efficacy and Safety of Laparoscopy for Blunt Abdominal Trauma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J Clin Med. 2021;10(9).doi: 10.3390/jcm10091853
Tiwari MM, Reynoso JF, High R, Tsang AW, Oleynikov D. Safety, efficacy, and cost-effectiveness of common laparoscopic procedures. Surg Endosc. 2011;25(4):1127-35.doi: 10.1007/s00464-010-1328-z
Zarka A, din M, Furqan K, Khan S. An Overview of Analysis of Learning Curve of Laproscopic Procedures in General Surgery Residents in Khyber Teaching Hospital, Peshawar. Pakistan Journal of Medical and Health Sciences. 2021;15:2766-8.doi: 10.53350/pjmhs2115102766
Yu M, Wang D-c, Wei J, Lei Y-h, Fu Z-j, Yang Y-h. Meta-Analysis on the Efficacy and Safety of Laparoscopic Surgery for Large Gastric Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors. The American Surgeon™. 2021;87(3):450-7.doi: 10.1177/0003134820951482
Rao G, Nayak S, Ganni S, Hassan A. Evaluation of Basic Laparoscopic Surgical Skills course programme for surgery residents- at a simulation lab in south India. International Journal of Surgery and Medicine. 2018;4:1.doi: 10.5455/ijsm.basic-laparoscopic-surgical-skills-course-programme-for-surgery-residents
Sousa JHBD, Tustumi F, Steinman M, Santos OFPDOS. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy performed by general surgery residents. Is it safe? How much does it cost? Revista do Colégio Brasileiro de Cirurgiões. 2021;48.doi,
Rangwala HS, Fatima H, Ali M, Rangwala BS. Comparing Safety and Efficacy: Laparoscopic vs. Open Pancreaticoduodenectomy for Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma: A Meta-analysis of Randomized Control Trials. Indian Journal of Surgical Oncology. 2024.doi: 10.1007/s13193-024-02132-4
Abdallah S, Dabas MM, Morcos RK, Rehman A, Shehryar A, Orakzai A, et al. Comparative Efficacy of Endoscopic Versus Open Surgical Techniques in the Management of Gastric Outlet Obstruction: A Systematic Review. Cureus. 2024;16(11):e73690.doi: 10.7759/cureus.73690
Muneeb MD, Baig MAN, Kamran M, Qudratullah S, Arain MS. Assessing the quality and standards of operative notes in general surgery; A teaching institute's experience in Pakistan. Pak J Med Sci. 2024;40(8):1837-40.doi: 10.12669/pjms.40.8.9443
Viqar Aslam KISKKAAGKSAH. Laparoscopic Treatment of Perforated Appendicitis. Pakistan Journal of Medical & Health Sciences. 2023;17(02):399.doi: 10.53350/pjmhs2023172399
Ahmed Siddiqui N, Siddiqui T, Shariff A, Khan MR, Ahmed M. Availability of Operative Surgical Experience and Supervision for Competency-Based Education: A Review of A General Surgery Program at A Tertiary Care Teaching Hospital in Pakistan. World Journal of Surgery. 2022;46(8):1849-54.doi: 10.1007/s00268-022-06571-4
Khan Z, Ahmed N, Rehman Au, Khan FU, Saqlain M, Martins MAP, et al. Audit of pre-operative antibiotic prophylaxis usage in elective surgical procedures in two teaching hospitals, Islamabad, Pakistan: An observational cross-sectional study. PLOS ONE. 2020;15(4):e0231188.doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0231188
Toru HK, Aizaz M, Orakzai AA, Jan ZU, Khattak AA, Ahmad D. Improving the Quality of General Surgical Operation Notes According to the Royal College of Surgeons (RCS) Guidelines: A Closed-Loop Audit. Cureus. 2023;15(11):e48147.doi: 10.7759/cureus.48147
Hao Y, Yu P, Qian F, Zhao Y, Shi Y, Tang B, et al. Comparison of laparoscopy-assisted and open radical gastrectomy for advanced gastric cancer: A retrospective study in a single minimally invasive surgery center. Medicine. 2016;95(25).doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000003936
Raza SMA, Mustafa A, Awan LA, Alam E, Abdal H, Cheema AI, et al. A comparative Clinical Trial of Laparoscopic Appendectomy versus Open Appendectomy in uncomplicated Cases: Evaluating Outcomes in Laparoscopic and Open Appendectomy. DEVELOPMENTAL MEDICO-LIFE-SCIENCES. 2024;1(5):35-42.doi: 10.69750/dmls.01.05.051
Hania b, Ahmad Z, Zafar A, Riaz D, Jawad A, Sahar DE. A Comparative Study of Postoperative Outcomes: Open Cholecystectomy versus Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: Evaluating Postoperative Outcomes in Gallbladder Surgery. DEVELOPMENTAL MEDICO-LIFE-SCIENCES. 2024;1(5):27-34.doi: 10.69750/dmls.01.05.053
Downloads
PlumX Metrics
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 DEVELOPMENTAL MEDICO-LIFE-SCIENCES
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The Author(s) 2024. Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/public domain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
